Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:17:28 -0500 From: Joe Auty <joe@netmusician.org> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: freebsd-update Message-ID: <0AEEBC98-3E03-4EF8-B531-6CEC4E73D08E@netmusician.org> In-Reply-To: <4810BF4B-C95D-461F-BA37-D8A32780AD10@netmusician.org> References: <9888aa630701210705r533a1085x9a06f26ee834d173@mail.gmail.com> <45B3FD3C.8090501@freebsd.org> <4810BF4B-C95D-461F-BA37-D8A32780AD10@netmusician.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hello, Could somebody kindly clarify my question about freebsd-update branches? I'd really appreciate it! Thanks in advance! On Feb 20, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Joe Auty wrote: > I just discovered freebsd-update, and one thing I'm not sure of > based on both the freebsd-update website and manpage is whether > specifying a branch is necessary after I've recompiled world in the > past if no kerberos/crypt related options are present in make.conf > overriding the defaults? Is the specification of the branch only > necessary if you want to abide by your make.conf overrides, and if > you have none, the branch argument is optional? > ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFF32f4CgdfeCwsL5ERAhvtAJ90+Y2kDyHKabqWQyhJNCTQ9W+VbgCff03E 2bEguifzvBgZtW6WQWVWie4= =68nw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0AEEBC98-3E03-4EF8-B531-6CEC4E73D08E>