From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 30 16:17:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8208316A4CE for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:17:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (ns1.freebsdmall.com [69.50.233.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577AE43D2F for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:17:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id 871E01CC73; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 08:29:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 08:29:32 -0800 From: Murray Stokely To: Christian Brueffer Message-ID: <20050130162932.GD94387@freebsdmall.com> References: <200501301610.j0UGAQFe095133@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501301610.j0UGAQFe095133@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D cc: freebsd-www@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: www/76841: [PATCH] Fixes on www/en/docs.sgml X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:17:13 -0000 On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 04:10:26PM +0000, Christian Brueffer wrote: > > - for corporate rollouts or commercial productization.

> > + for corporate rollouts or commercial production.

> > =20 > > Hmm, I'm not sure about the second change. I haven't found the word > productization in the Merriam Webster online dictionary or in > dict.leo.org, but a quick google search seems to indicate that this is a > common word. Yes it is, I used similar words in the releng article. Commercial productization is a common phrase when referring to extending open source (particularly BSD licensed code) for commercial products. productization was the intended word and 'production' is not a good replacement word in this context. - Murray