Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:00:47 -0500 From: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, Ruben van Staveren <ruben@verweg.com> Subject: Re: conf/144213: [rc.d] [patch] Disappearing zvols on reboot Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002230756030.10754@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny> In-Reply-To: <4B83510B.1050805@FreeBSD.org> References: <201002222138.o1MLcoGs086212@freefall.freebsd.org> <4B83510B.1050805@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:52, dougb@ wrote: > I don't see any problem with this change from an rc.d standpoint, but I > don't know anything about zfs. Comments and/or suggestions welcome. > > > Doug > > > On 02/22/10 13:38, linimon@FreeBSD.org wrote: >> Old Synopsis: Disappearing zvols on reboot >> New Synopsis: [rc.d] [patch] Disappearing zvols on reboot >> >> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-rc >> Responsible-Changed-By: linimon >> Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Feb 22 21:38:23 UTC 2010 >> Responsible-Changed-Why: >> Over to maintainer(s). >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144213 > This is a good catch. I believe it would probably be best suited to be 1). above mount -a or 2). at the very least above share -a. Other then that non-zfs-root systems should not see a negative difference. Regards, -- jhell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1002230756030.10754>