Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:33:36 +1000
From:      Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
To:        Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Protection from the dreaded "rm -fr /"
Message-ID:  <20041002083336.GA10355@k7.mavetju>
In-Reply-To: <20041002081928.GA21439@gothmog.gr>
References:  <20041002081928.GA21439@gothmog.gr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 11:19:28AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> John Beck, who works for Sun, has posted an entry in his blog yesterday
> about "rm -fr /" protection, which I liked a lot:
> http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/jbeck/20041001#rm_rf_protection
> 
> His idea was remarkably simple, so I went ahead and wrote this patch for
> rm(1) of FreeBSD:

I'm not so much worried about 'rm -rf /', but I'm more worried about
"rm -rf *" in my home directory. It happened once because I was too
happy switching directories before realising what I was doing in
the wrong directory.

Also, refusing to do it is not the ideal way to go, I think that
if you have two -f's specified it would do it anyway. Just my two
cents of course.

Edwin
-- 
Edwin Groothuis      |            Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
edwin@mavetju.org    |          Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041002083336.GA10355>