From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 14 23:00:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33B537B401; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:00:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (ip114.bella-vista.sfo.interquest.net [66.199.86.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4001943FAF; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:00:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6F60oLv033994; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:00:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6F60oRN033993; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:00:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:00:50 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Alexander Kabaev Message-ID: <20030715060049.GA33856@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Alexander Kabaev , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200307121933.h6CJXYsP069815@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200307121933.h6CJXYsP069815@repoman.freebsd.org> cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc/config/i386 freebsd.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 06:00:54 -0000 On Sat, Jul 12, 2003, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > kan 2003/07/12 12:33:34 PDT > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > contrib/gcc/config/i386 freebsd.h > Log: > Do not override FP rounding options for 32bit platforms. amd64 doesn't > need this. You mean for 64-bit platforms, right? Does this mean that gcc's problems with FP precision and constant evaluation have been fixed, at least for amd64? I understand there have been some improvements in this area in gcc 3.3.