From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 26 01:00:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD7937B408 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 01:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C801E43FBD for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 01:00:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3Q80aUp052009 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 01:00:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3Q80aY1052008; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 01:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 01:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200304260800.h3Q80aY1052008@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Murray Stokely Subject: Re: docs/46181: "make fetch-recursive" target description is missing in the ports manpage. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Murray Stokely List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 08:00:38 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/46181; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Murray Stokely To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/46181: "make fetch-recursive" target description is missing in the ports manpage. Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 00:56:44 -0700 On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:20:02AM -0800, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > I'll try to make the necessary changes and have them reviewed by > freebsd-ports and/or portmgr. The ports.7 manpage contains a lot of > the stuff that /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk includes in comments. There > are other things that could be added too. The following is a list, in > case someone is faster doing this and beats me to it: Does anyone have a patch for this yet? It would be nice to update ports.7. Can the original submitter at least propose some exact text to be added if not a patch? - Murray