Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Aug 2004 10:50:11 +0200
From:      cpghost@cordula.ws
To:        roland Mathieu <roland.mathieu@free.fr>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: A question about /tmp
Message-ID:  <20040809085011.GA7374@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040809083250.GA12445@lycurgue.localnet>
References:  <20040809083250.GA12445@lycurgue.localnet>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 10:32:50AM +0200, roland Mathieu wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I want to install FreeBSD with a small root partition. It's
> possible to use a different partition for /tmp, but /tmp can also be a
> symbolic link pointing, for example, /var/tmp. Is it a good idea ? If not
> what sort of problem will I encounter ?

There's nothing wrong with a symlink. I have /tmp -> /var/tmp on
all my servers and never noticed the difference to a dedicated
/tmp partition. Theoretically, you'd experience a small performance
hit, but only if you open(2) many /tmp files very very often. 
Even with a make buildworld, or a portupgrade -aRrkf, I didn't
notice any difference in speed. Of course, YMMV.

-cpghost.

-- 
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040809085011.GA7374>