From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 4 09:54:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA01334 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 09:54:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from darkstar (dialin2.anlw.anl.gov [141.221.252.102]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA01329 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 09:54:24 -0800 (PST) Received: (from cmott@localhost) by darkstar (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA08796; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 10:53:53 -0700 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 10:53:52 -0700 (MST) From: Charles Mott X-Sender: cmott@darkstar To: Eivind Eklund cc: Brian Somers , Ari Suutari , hackers@freebsd.org, brian@utell.co.uk Subject: Re: Single socket version of natd In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970204103732.00ac3a30@dimaga.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 4 Feb 1997, Eivind Eklund wrote: > And all the other really nescessary code-changes are done - everything is > changed to ANSI style, and integrated with PPP from -current patched with > #ifdef's to make it compile and work on all versions from 2.1.0 to > -current, with an extra command 'alias' that set alias options. Do the alias options default the way they have in the past, or does the user have to explicitly set them? Can packet aliasing be enabled a ppp command as well as the -alias command line option? If so, is this a good idea? My concern here is that users be able to use the same ppp.conf file with and without packet aliasing. Charles Mott