From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jun 11 13:44:43 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA18315
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 11 Jun 1995 13:44:43 -0700
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (bettina.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA18308
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jun 1995 13:44:41 -0700
Received: from localhost.v-site.net (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA01566 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jun 1995 13:32:08 -0700
Message-Id: <199506112032.NAA01566@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: rah.star-gate.com: Host localhost.v-site.net didn't use HELO protocol
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6delta 4/7/95
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: performance...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 1995 13:32:07 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


Not bad,  on the 1.x days I used to get about 7 to 8 minutes to
compile my kernel and on the early days of FreeBSD 2.0 it was
like 13 minutes or so. I now that this is not very 
scientific .

compiling a kernel:

text    data    bss     dec     hex
806912  57344   79536   943792  e66b0
510.885u 56.288s 10:23.50 90.9% 1118+1251k 1826+572io 208pf+0w

Amancio