From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Feb 14 10:41:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (rwcrmhc54.attbi.com [216.148.227.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F3D37B417; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:41:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020214184111.IBEF1214.rwcrmhc54.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:41:11 +0000 Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1EIfBH22222; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:41:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200202141841.g1EIfBH22222@bmah.dyndns.org> To: darklogik@pittgoth.com Cc: bmah@acm.org, Alexey Zelkin , Valentino Vaschetto , Nik Clayton , Dima Dorfman , doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: replacement In-reply-to: <3C6BECC5.2000703@pittgoth.com> References: <20020213230809.I92878@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20020214124806.A7765@ark.cris.net> <200202141639.g1EGdih21528@bmah.dyndns.org> <3C6BECC5.2000703@pittgoth.com> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Rhodes message dated "Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:58:45 -0500." From: bmah@acm.org (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@acm.org X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <22221.1013712071.1@intruder.bmah.org> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:41:11 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org If memory serves me right, Tom Rhodes wrote: > Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > > If memory serves me right, Alexey Zelkin wrote: > > > --SNIP-- > > > > Just what we need...another 6000 entities. :-p > > > oh nooooo..... > > > > > > (find and grep are more expensive than make lint?!?) > > > > Before we bikeshed this whole thing to death, can we at least get rid > > of the tag first, as there's essentially no argument on this > > point? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Bruce. > > > > > I recommended that a little awhile ago, and i'll agree on it now. Get > rid of the port tag so that we can begin work on the conversion. After > we dump the port tag, many parts of the documentation will need a sweep > through for the replacement. Was this done before, like a large > replacement of a tag, where perhaps an awk script was used in the > processing? In either case, lets first dump the then work on the > new stuff ;) Well...the patches that dd posted along with his origional message did just that... Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message