From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 13 12:00:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3362106566B for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 12:00:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6CA8FC19 for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 12:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1M4D8f-0004WJ-AV for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 May 2009 12:00:45 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 12:00:45 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 12:00:45 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:00:46 +0200 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <49FC1BD0.4030306@T-Online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) In-Reply-To: <49FC1BD0.4030306@T-Online.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Sender: news Subject: Re: UFS2 and SSDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 12:00:52 -0000 Juergen Dankoweit wrote: > Hello to the list, > > my question is, how does UFS2 behave on solid state disks? What about > performance, stability and data security? > There are no special optimizations or pessimizations, compared to other mainstream file systems, so - average performance, unchanged stability and data security.