From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 11 10:07:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32080106566B; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:07:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from smtp.timeweb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2a03:6f00:1::5c35:7439]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C398FC1B; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [213.148.20.85] (helo=hive.panopticon) by smtp.timeweb.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ROo0r-0000nF-3Q; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:07:09 +0400 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.32]) by hive.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0ACB84D; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:07:08 +0400 (MSK) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A7C12B823; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:07:08 +0400 (MSK) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:07:08 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Martin Wilke Message-ID: <20111111100708.GA24126@hades.panopticon> References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBCC587.10701@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EBCC587.10701@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin , Stanislav Sedov Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:07:11 -0000 * Martin Wilke (miwi@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > >> They have been deprecated for a while and noone said anything about those, that > >> is the purpose of the DEPRECATED status. The "not used anymore" mean not used in > > Why should we go through it again and again? If it's not broken, it's > > useable, you may not remove it, period. > > > >> the portstree (ie no more depended on). > > Most of the portstree is leaf ports, now what? > > > >> If someone really needs it, he can: > > What we need is to not have to do extra work and to not have extra noise > > on the maillist because someone does unneeded things. I really don't > > want to call that vandalism. > > > You can't only put in u have also to put out. Why don't we take out Gnome and KDE then? I don't use it. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru