From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jul 4 21:40:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from po4.glue.umd.edu (po4.glue.umd.edu [128.8.10.124]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7068D37B5C8; Tue, 4 Jul 2000 21:40:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from howardjp@glue.umd.edu) Received: from z.glue.umd.edu (root@z.glue.umd.edu [128.8.10.71]) by po4.glue.umd.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e654eYW16748; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 00:40:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from z.glue.umd.edu (sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.glue.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA25968; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 00:40:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (howardjp@localhost) by z.glue.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA25964; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 00:40:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: z.glue.umd.edu: howardjp owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 00:40:34 -0400 (EDT) From: James Howard To: Cosmic 665 Cc: adrian@FreeBSD.ORG, mhenrion@cybercable.fr, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: why isnt there a ext2fs.ko ? In-Reply-To: <20000704171635.51800.qmail@hotmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Cosmic 665 wrote: > > Statically Compiled modules are much better then the lkd's. Get used to it > :P But I only need EXT2FS support once everyone few months. It makes no sense to have it eating kernel memory 100% of the time. Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message