From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 5 05:20:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CD9106564A for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 05:20:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43AAC8FC27 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 05:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o555K6ok033092 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 05:20:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o555K6Fo033090; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 05:20:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 05:20:06 GMT Message-Id: <201006050520.o555K6Fo033090@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Eijiro Shibusawa Cc: Subject: Re: ports/147487: [PATCH] strange behaviour of math/arpack linking with lapack library X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eijiro Shibusawa List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 05:20:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/147487; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eijiro Shibusawa To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, ej-sib@ice.uec.ac.jp, stephen@missouri.edu Cc: Subject: Re: ports/147487: [PATCH] strange behaviour of math/arpack linking with lapack library Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 14:15:24 +0900 Dear Stephen Montgomery-Smith, maintainer of math/arpack, For fixing the problem, only arpack-arscnd-2.patch.gz is needed. I have tested your patch, and I found the library including the patch produced a desired result. Thank you very much for taking care of the PR. After sent the PR I just noticed I had forgotten to attach my own patch, and it had been already sent. However your patch is simpler than it, hence your patch should be merged to the ports tree. Thanks, Eijiro Shibusawa