From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jul 11 18:49:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from c1mailgw1.prontomail.com (c1mailgw1.prontomail.com [208.178.29.197]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4E437BA5E for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 18:49:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from giffunip@asme.org) Received: from c1mail01.prontomail.com (208.178.29.101) by c1mailgw1.prontomail.com (NPlex 4.5.049) id 3969EE5E00031FC2 for arch@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 18:49:11 -0700 Received: by c1mail01.prontomail.com (NPlex 2.0.123); Tue, 11 Jul 2000 18:49:08 -0700 Received: from 209.88.169.254 by SmtpServer for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 01:49:23 +0000 Message-ID: <396BAD9C.69FF445B@asme.org> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 18:28:28 -0500 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Organization: Universidad Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? References: <20000621221636.A4137@kilt.nothing-going-on.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In order to fully "comply" with POLA, I would prefer not have LPRng by default on FreeBSD 4.x, FreeBSD 5.0 can be different because people will expect the BSDi code in it and since they are now adopting LPRng, it would be good to have it there. May I suggest we delay the decision until a 5.0 release is near, and give some time for our new maintainer to commit his improvements? cheers, Pedro. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message