From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 17 18:45:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CE337B443 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:45:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f3I1jpH03686; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:45:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:45:51 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Terry Lambert Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More on Bad Bug Message-ID: <20010417184551.B976@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <200104172328.QAA01367@usr09.primenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200104172328.QAA01367@usr09.primenet.com>; from tlambert@primenet.com on Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:28:46PM +0000 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Terry Lambert [010417 16:28] wrote: > > I guess no one else is interested in this bug hunt, or no one else > is using 30,000 sockets on any of their machines? I've committed a variation of your invariants check to -current, -stable is frozen and I'd prefer to leave it as is until after the release date. As far as tracking down the problem I don't have the resources in terms of hardware, code and time for that right now, however it looks like you've found a possible bug. Please keep us in the loop on this. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] http://www.egr.unlv.edu/~slumos/on-netbsd.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message