From owner-freebsd-current Mon Nov 2 04:57:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA06285 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 04:57:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net (porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net [206.64.4.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA06278 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 04:57:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA16027; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 08:00:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) X-Authentication-Warning: porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net: bright owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 08:00:18 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein X-Sender: bright@porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net To: Brian Feldman cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux clone() In-Reply-To: <199811020814.AAA08887@dingo.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2 Nov 1998, Mike Smith wrote: > > Oh, BTW, > > someone tell me if this would be something really terrible to accidentally > > do in kernel space: > > printf("%d %d %#x %#x"); > > note no arguments... so far I don't notice any destabilization but I sure > > hope I didn't fudge up the kernel stack! > > Nope; that's generally harmless, just prints lots of garbage. > > As for test apps; someone ought to be able to build you a trivial > clone() test program on a Linux system. > Most of the developers here run linux boxen (well all of them except me) send me code and i'll compile it. Alfred Perlstein - Programmer, HotJobs Inc. - www.hotjobs.com -- There are operating systems, and then there's FreeBSD. -- http://www.freebsd.org/ 3.0-current To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message