From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 16 02:22:16 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA28155 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 16 Oct 1996 02:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA28142 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 1996 02:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.6/8.6.5) with SMTP id CAA04915; Wed, 16 Oct 1996 02:22:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199610160922.CAA04915@root.com> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Michael Smith cc: jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com (Joe Greco), jdw@wwwi.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IP bugs in FreeBSD 2.1.5 In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 16 Oct 1996 12:02:42 +0930." <199610160232.MAA28294@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 02:22:01 -0700 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> I am curious to know if -core has an opinion on where the line should >> be (or maybe even has been) drawn. > >I would expect that they do (Jordan has hinted that discussions are going >on, which is a positive sign). We're still talking about it. Right now we still intend to release a 2.1.6 in December, but we are also considering releasing 2.2 at about the same time. With all the nifty stuff like SMP, we want to move along towards 3.0. No concrete decisions have yet been made, but we all would like to see the technology in -current enjoy wider use and this plan seems to have wide acceptence. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project