Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 21:59:53 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG>, fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone working on fsck? Message-ID: <20030317215953.49aa5cd1.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303171204380.70394-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303171204380.70394-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=.uaQk/vJHQv,bDY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 12:22:33 -0800 (PST)
Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote:
Howdy,
> It wouldn;t be super fast but at least it COULD be used to check a > 30TB array, where the in-memory version would beed a process VM space > of 24MB which is clearly impossible on a x86.
I'm sure most of us have computers with more than 24MB :-P, sorry couldn't resist.
It's an interesting problem anyway, does anyone have insight on how other OSs and FS handle these kind of problems? e.g. Solaris with vxfs or Linux with XFS/JFS/this week's FS.
Cheers,
--
Miguel Mendez - flynn@energyhq.homeip.net
GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt
EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk
Of course it runs NetBSD!
Tired of Spam? -> http://www.trustic.com
--=.uaQk/vJHQv,bDY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQE+djdSnLctrNyFFPERAqy7AKC6Lc7SZyZ21M7uR5hIJvW9WM2ZMgCgyOZo
n5PuqPcZMcHt8unWJbUPPOc=
=hFif
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=.uaQk/vJHQv,bDY--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030317215953.49aa5cd1.flynn>