From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 15 06:07:01 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4DB16A402;
	Mon, 15 May 2006 06:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg)
Received: from jengal.datamax.bg (jengal.datamax.bg [82.103.104.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1307943D46;
	Mon, 15 May 2006 06:07:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg)
Received: from qlovarnika.bg.datamax (qlovarnika.bg.datamax [192.168.10.2])
	by jengal.datamax.bg (Postfix) with SMTP id 93431B859;
	Mon, 15 May 2006 09:06:59 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 29699 invoked by uid 1002);
	Mon, 15 May 2006 06:06:59 -0000
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:06:59 +0300
From: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
To: Beech Rintoul <beech@alaskaparadise.com>
Message-ID: <20060515060659.GA29669@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
References: <200605121400.13134.beech@alaskaparadise.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200605121400.13134.beech@alaskaparadise.com>
X-OS: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Questiion about followup pr
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: vd@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 06:07:01 -0000

On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:59:57PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> What is the accepted way to send a patch with a followup to a pr? The system 
> seems to mangle them badly either pasted in the mail or attached?
> 

Pasted in the mail. What exactly do you mean by "mangle"?

-- 
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv

Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
                -- Edsger W. Dijkstra