Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:06:01 +0100
From:      Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
To:        Alexander Nedotsukov <bland@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: max MTU for fwip device.
Message-ID:  <1092135961.13089.2.camel@builder02.qubesoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <4118A46B.9030901@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <4116EA33.8040405@FreeBSD.org> <411843FD.4090201@FreeBSD.org><41189199.5020201@FreeBSD.org> <1092133653.13089.0.camel@builder02.qubesoft.com> <4118A46B.9030901@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 11:33, Alexander Nedotsukov wrote:
> >>>Interesting. The specification for IPv6 on firewire is clearer:
> >>>
> >>>  The default MTU size for IPv6 packets on an IEEE1394 network is 1500
> >>>  octets.  This size may be reduced by a Router Advertisement [DISC]
> >>>  containing an MTU option which specifies a smaller MTU, or by manual
> >>>  configuration of each node.  If a Router Advertisement received on an
> >>>  IEEE1394 interface has an MTU option specifying an MTU larger than
> >>>  1500, or larger than a manually configured value, that MTU option may
> >>>  be logged to system management but MUST be otherwise ignored.  The
> >>>  mechanism to extend MTU size between particular two nodes is for
> >>>  further study.
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>Mmm. I still do not see any prohibition of MTU size > 1500. What I see 
> >>here is definition of automatic MTU adjustment. It's stated that ATM MTU 
> >>size may be only reduced by such mechanism. Am I right?
> >>So manual configuration of interface for MTU size > 1500 violates nothing.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Of course - I certainly don't want to stop people from configuring an
> >MTU size > 1500. I just think that for the compiled in default, we
> >should go with the spec for now.
> >
> >  
> >
> I do not object default MTU either. But the problem is we have hardcoded 
> 1500 limit in SIOCSIFMTU  ioctl handler ATM. Check sys/net/if_fwsubr.c ;-)

Oops - I'll fix that when I get a chance. I've been side-tracked
recently trying to finish off the TLS stuff.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1092135961.13089.2.camel>