Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:47:13 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r382947 - head/games/lbreakout Message-ID: <20150402094713.GD1374@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <20150402063430.GD89620@FreeBSD.org> References: <201504011956.t31Ju5oi069735@svn.freebsd.org> <20150402063430.GD89620@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Alexey Dokuchaev (danfe@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > New Revision: 382947 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/382947 > > > > Log: > > - Remove unneeded -pthread replace > > [...] > > If you anticipate more of similar rather trivial changes, I would really > appreciate if you'd group them together (e.g., on per-category basis) to > reduce lists spamming, thank you. Sorry, but I'll never base the way I do commits on unrelated effects such as `list spamming'. Commit corresponds to an isolated change, so if I change a single port, it'll be a single commit, if I do semi-automated change to a group of ports, it'll be a group commit. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150402094713.GD1374>