From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 19 20:14:19 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FC716A419; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnsanchez@wait4.org) Received: from sumo.dreamhost.com (sumo.dreamhost.com [66.33.216.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B4D13C4A7; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:14:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnsanchez@wait4.org) Received: from spunkymail-a16.g.dreamhost.com (balanced.mail.policyd.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.119]) by sumo.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A2D1F6346; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sauron.lan.box (201-34-100-43.paemt701.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br [201.34.100.43]) by spunkymail-a16.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318657BA3B; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:42:14 -0200 From: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez To: Robert Watson Message-Id: <20071019174214.e8672336.rnsanchez@wait4.org> In-Reply-To: <20071018120730.N60783@fledge.watson.org> References: <55408.1192704998@critter.freebsd.dk> <20071018120730.N60783@fledge.watson.org> Organization: SYS_WAIT4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-unknown-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Max Laier , Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org, Julian Elischer , "Constantine A. Murenin" Subject: Re: sensors fun.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:14:19 -0000 On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:17:01 +0100 (BST) Robert Watson wrote: > However, this does range a bit far afield from the thread topic. The > basic point I was making is that sysctl offers a more semantically > rich and, to be honest, better defined way of interacting with live > subsystems than device files do in a generic sense. You can hammer > down semantics for device nodes, but the code associated with sysctl > is much simpler when the goal is to offer mib-like semantics even in > quite simple cases (integer set/put). And there's even a MIB for that (perhaps someone even pointed it already): http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3433.txt Regards. -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez rnsanchez@wait4.org Powered by FreeBSD "Left to themselves, things tend to go from bad to worse."