From owner-freebsd-current Wed Aug 5 12:17:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA08722 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 12:17:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from austin.polstra.com (austin.polstra.com [206.213.73.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA08716 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 12:17:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@austin.polstra.com) Received: from austin.polstra.com (jdp@localhost) by austin.polstra.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA19201; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 12:16:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Message-Id: <199808051916.MAA19201@austin.polstra.com> To: ken@plutotech.com Subject: Re: Heads up on LFS In-Reply-To: <199808051606.KAA10361@panzer.plutotech.com> References: <199808051606.KAA10361@panzer.plutotech.com> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 12:16:58 -0700 From: John Polstra Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I looked around the web site, and I even downloaded the source. It > looks like they're using FreeBSD kernel sources circa late '96 or early > '97. If they're using a CAM implementation at all, it must be DEC's CAM > implementation when they run on the Alpha with DEC UNIX. I'm 99% sure you're right. I've talked to the SPIN folks before. I remember they were complaining loudly about how big and bulky CAM is. But that conversation took place when FreeBSD-CAM was still just a glimmer in the eyes of Justin and you. -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-knowledge is always bad news." -- John Barth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message