From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Sep 30 01:42:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA13573 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 30 Sep 1997 01:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elaine39.Stanford.EDU (elaine39.Stanford.EDU [171.64.15.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA13568 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 1997 01:42:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from andrsn@localhost) by elaine39.Stanford.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.4) id BAA22287; Tue, 30 Sep 1997 01:41:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 01:41:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Annelise Anderson To: Greg Lehey cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Network Connection Not Working In-Reply-To: <19970930165424.08430@lemis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, Greg Lehey wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 1997 at 11:26:02PM -0700, Annelise Anderson wrote: > > Sep 29 20:03:49 andrsn /kernel: 1 3C5x9 board(s) on ISA found at 0x300 > > Sep 29 20:03:49 andrsn /kernel: ep0 at 0x300-0x30f irq 10 on isa > > Sep 29 20:03:49 andrsn /kernel: ep0: aui/utp/bnc[*BNC*] address 00:20:af:be:eb:e0 > > > So here is some output-- my current guess is that wire that goes > > from the Ethernet card connector (10-Base-2) > > 10-Base 2? Your boot message says BNC. How do you configure the > interface? Do you set the link flags specifically? I don't see Well, Nemeth et.al. describes 10BASE2 as "...coaxial cable with BNC connectors...." Maybe that's not the same "BNC." I just know it's not an RJ-45. I don't do anything except what's in rc.conf: ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1" # default loopback device configuration. ifconfig_ep0="inet 36.33.0.163 netmask 255.255.0.0" ifconfig_ppp0="inet 36.33.0.157 netmask 255.255.255.255" > anything in the ifconfig output above. Check the link flags: I'm not sure what you mean here--checking the link flags. Apparently I'm using the default. > > > -link0 Use the BNC port (default). > > link0 -link1 Use the AUI port. > > link0 link1 Use the UTP port. > > This would suggest that you should be showing LINK0 and LINK1 in the > output above. > > > is broken--does this look consistent with that? And if so, do I > > just cut it and reattach it? > > It's consistent, but it doesn't have to be the right answer. Your > board could have got itself confused--I've seen this happen with the > 3C509, and occasionally I have been able to fix it with the following > sequence: > > # ifconfig ep0 down > # ifconfig ep0 up > > This won't cost you much, and you can do it from where you are > (assuming you haven't gone to bed yet). I tried it--it didn't change anything. Thanks for the quick response. I think I will take my wire cutters to work tomorrow :) > Greg Annelise