From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 03:09:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF9E106564A for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 03:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBB08FC08 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 03:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 46DAC56205; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 22:09:31 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 22:09:31 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Fritz Wuehler Message-ID: <20120603030931.GA11225@lonesome.com> References: <20120602052228.GA6624@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 03:09:37 -0000 On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 01:43:43AM +0200, Fritz Wuehler wrote: > So there could be lots of overlap and just looking at the two numbers > you posted doesn't really tell the whole story. No, I agree that it doesn't. I was just trying to add an aside, and point out that the task would not be trivial. Since I'm heavily invested in FreeBSD ports I think I need to step back and let other folks comment in this thread. mcl