From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 15 22:03:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445F716A4CE for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:03:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net (outbound01.telus.net [199.185.220.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE3A43D31 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:03:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aaron@daltons.ca) Received: from d137-186-239-215.abhsia.telus.net ([137.186.239.215]) by priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.netESMTP <20040815220314.BLBA1328.priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net@d137-186-239-215.abhsia.telus.net>; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 16:03:14 -0600 From: Aaron Dalton To: Bill Moran , Remko Lodder Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 16:03:26 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200408151429.05110.aaron@daltons.ca> <20040815170806.45fcb779.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040815170806.45fcb779.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200408151603.26022.aaron@daltons.ca> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is promiscuous mode bad? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:03:15 -0000 Thank you so much for your replies! This makes much more sense now. I am currently running Snort. I will examine its documentation to see if promiscuous mode is really necessary. In the meantime, am I correct in assuming the only threat is from local users? If so, currently all users are trusted so I shant panic just yet. Thank you again for your help! -- Aaron Dalton http://aaron.daltons.ca