From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 23 09:28:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF35E16A4CE for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blurp.one.pl (blurp.t4.ds.pwr.wroc.pl [156.17.226.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8498E43D55 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:28:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gizmen@blurp.one.pl) Received: by blurp.one.pl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 810A9A47; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:32:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:32:03 +0200 From: GiZmen To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040423113203.GB41414@blurp.one.pl> References: <20040423053702.GD64148@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: Changing ttl of incoming packets X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:28:05 -0000 > yep I'd have to agree with that.. > All the needed bits should already be there. > > > > start with natd and chop it until you have what you want.. > > > > > ports/net/tcpmssd might be easier to adopt. ---end quoted text--- Yes maybe it is good way to do this but what if i do not use ipfw. I am using pf and i do not have IPDIVERT in kernel. Is some kind of packet forward to this daemon will work ? -- Best Regards: GiZmen UNIX is user-friendly; it's just picky about its friends UNIX is simple; it just takes a genius to understand its simplicity