From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 04:44:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4936A258214 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:44:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48c2Yh0GMGz4Jc2 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:44:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 07217258213; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:44:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B8E258212 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:44:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48c2Yg3cmrz4JZb for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:44:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9044E1E24A for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02A4iMAO039274 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:44:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02A4iMTq039273 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:44:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206484] powerpc (non-64) -r294201: /usr/src/Makefile.inc1 can try -target on gcc 4.2.1's cpp command lines but it is rejected by cpp Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:44:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Overcome By Events X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:44:24 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206484 Mark Millard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events Status|New |Closed --- Comment #1 from Mark Millard --- With head having dropped gcc 4.2.1 and things like controlling the gcc bootstrap, the details of how the problem was reached are going away (once 12 and 11 are no longer supported). But /usr/src/Makefile.inc1 still uses: CROSSENV+=3D CC=3D"${XCC} ${XCFLAGS}" CXX=3D"${XCXX} ${XCXXFLAGS} ${XC= FLAGS}" \ CPP=3D"${XCPP} ${XCFLAGS}" \ . . . which still presumes that the C preprocessor involved will accept all the options that the c compiler would accept. But having no alternatives to llvm as what would be cross built, I doubt head (13 and later) has the issue any more. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=