From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jun 20 9:36:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6820237BEA7; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 09:36:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA53947; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 18:36:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: Paul Saab , Mike Smith , Jonathan Lemon , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kblob discussion. In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 20 Jun 2000 09:46:55 MDT." <200006201546.JAA18608@nomad.yogotech.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 18:36:01 +0200 Message-ID: <53945.961518961@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200006201546.JAA18608@nomad.yogotech.com>, Nate Williams writes: >> I think you may be confusing the fact that there are people from Yahoo >> who are also committers. I think the fact that we bring our knowledge >> (mostly filo's) to FreeBSD is a good thing. > >My apologies. It just seems that recent commits have been WWW-centric, >and my knee-jerk reaction was to assume that somehow Yahoo was pushing >for them. In general it would be nice if you would not reply with any knee-jerk reactions, no matter what. In most cases I find your second email on topics to be much more usable than the first. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message