From nobody Thu Nov 18 09:51:52 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8101892273 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:52:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@scatterlings.org) Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hvw7Y32Wzz3mCH for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:52:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@scatterlings.org) Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id o17so5485943qtk.1 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 01:52:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=scatterlings-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rONBE9LJWM69iu5wBMjX2yLZBfoJFXhcHXpuo5FPYI4=; b=DeIJ7RW0ngVGisgFZ7cmSoHLj2gR+ERxUM3+wCK8P8XtcboEj4qIg2bQ+95iYYQlDb ApL5RLPGVKtx4hX5VvLqLKob11tJDGSXQbqjIpq7aVgFEiFDoTfDwGV/rrzSLF6+F7xo Uk1/RebG71mmsLqKj5cR0z67KowY98p+6Oww7PMHhBgp5Im4dJNsvKfpDCn0CTGtk6NB 7liGhvnOMayvOdcJmNJNYTYDq/NjW0pDqQp+wHGEpEW+u2NJaZAfPb57BcKsprgsNApt AbQjvk3I7C/063bSpiUxq34aV1KL6jUJlFEFham2dJG+p1jYxmJT2fgHxLeBRM2ua/aA bdqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rONBE9LJWM69iu5wBMjX2yLZBfoJFXhcHXpuo5FPYI4=; b=ASIt8IgPFvK8kuDaB2rKc0p3a5WeKUsZSD39Qr9VlqYqH8VLKeYLUrGenbmhyReqCM 4PV0Qs2mld/lZuiuXQHab4rKYsRvxn4HbOXw7+/8iXV/wlI+tLmQGZaQBmf7h692EfWt SCsRDVytvYdLAX2jAuKymY4nq68fx84+WFd5oISmlaL1OEOBeJHohrINjMK1VdZKM2k1 1Nz8UCCaAYF9tVZkJ6YI/bE5f7Y/AdhqBSdtoe0BXZ/z9Q77qBq8/8s00/mUvzg8u+QF dNT1T+6afxUlNvcTMBNcWxY9tZ/GwkaKD8G1xYPvX9disg85VN7fnHf/i7o4EZrWf4AA nYxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mnrkPswLH65RL7PhoZO/Ys9YQpEPI2pD3Yakhmfw8zVamkP55 cKknTCa2FAZV5EFzewoB5rWWkwoq/JJ450GhLvYsOYujkg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtrKfDpXg+1W+2JSEkcxvp7ZOv00RsUUnoCUW+85ePjGZ6uU4r51xWucFjKsc+qZX0JeibEcTtfZoNAlJAxpw= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5a01:: with SMTP id n1mr25097343qta.13.1637229123598; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 01:52:03 -0800 (PST) List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan McKeown Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 11:51:52 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IETF proposal to unicast 127.1/16 - should we be concerned? To: Dewayne Geraghty Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000540ca005d10d1c70" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hvw7Y32Wzz3mCH X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --000000000000540ca005d10d1c70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, 18 Nov 2021, 07:50 Dewayne Geraghty, < dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au> wrote: > As this is an individual proposal within the IETF framework, the concern > should be tempered, however the draft proposal for 127.1/16 to be > routable is being discussed. > As I read it, the proposal is more wide-ranging than that, allowing all of 127/8 to be routable with the exception of 127.0/16 which is still reserved for loopback. > --000000000000540ca005d10d1c70--