Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:05:51 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r382947 - head/games/lbreakout Message-ID: <20150402100551.GY30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20150402063430.GD89620@FreeBSD.org> References: <201504011956.t31Ju5oi069735@svn.freebsd.org> <20150402063430.GD89620@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--krsqJi1PDCheOQxO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 06:34:30AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 07:56:05PM +0000, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > > New Revision: 382947 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/382947 > >=20 > > Log: > > - Remove unneeded -pthread replace > > [...] >=20 > If you anticipate more of similar rather trivial changes, I would really > appreciate if you'd group them together (e.g., on per-category basis) to > reduce lists spamming, thank you. >=20 > ./danfe >=20 The point of atomic commit is important because it allows to quickly and easily revert if needed, in such particular case as of -pthread one may have missed something due to the complexity to figure out if something needs to = be linked to pthread or not on FreeBSD lower that FreeBSD 11-CURRENT/10-STABLE. I prefer commits being splitted into small commits for everything that maybe subject to a revert (yes I know with svn we can sparse revert) Bapt --krsqJi1PDCheOQxO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUdFH8ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyqNwCgwIUc0ctxHR5TnBV1enX23Ae/ R4sAoIhPnCdtkAu9BE4NdqGtTmbQelrZ =IIbD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --krsqJi1PDCheOQxO--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150402100551.GY30115>