From owner-freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org  Fri May 20 17:30:09 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC7CB43FE5
 for <freebsd-acpi@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 20 May 2016 17:30:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (unknown [IPv6:2602:304:b010:ef20::f2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "gw.catspoiler.org", Issuer "gw.catspoiler.org" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8DF910AF
 for <freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 20 May 2016 17:30:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2])
 by gw.catspoiler.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4KHU1kS087654;
 Fri, 20 May 2016 10:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <201605201730.u4KHU1kS087654@gw.catspoiler.org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 10:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: ACPI userland patches available for review
To: robert.moore@intel.com
cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E37E47CF3E@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 17:30:10 -0000

On 20 May, Moore, Robert wrote:
> Is the acpidump the same one that is part of ACPICA? If so, we can
> integrate the change(s).

Both appear to be part of ACPICA.  I would prefer to see these get
integrated upstream.  I've uploaded both to my account on freefall.

<https://people.freebsd.org/~truckman/acpidb.patch>
<https://people.freebsd.org/~truckman/acpidump.patch>