From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Tue Jun 14 17:21:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B17B72E6A for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outro.pessoa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C993A2B86; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outro.pessoa@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id k204so864026wmk.0; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:21:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=L78mtrCrkBRt2ElC0qY2XsJuMGEIzH1I4unUtDJ7ouw=; b=HTCyu5mY6CkRJH179AaN/SqYYWtzHiCQw7f+u/7ezgZE66VBsB2VaNHzmzzMokZjTr 1h29D5AH4/pr7RjOfFKyuPP5nbgtIgzfjF79+IrA1CMSM2368ri3HwO3t1zihmrEE23O nqvxADCknp7Sx8y85l7h8Ehc5wizfFfEGqwe72sgjOTER6ciZySCoUHk0SlOdE5OnE6/ FHwSD2KZoDEaFcR5B4tJY9yatY2DBTF4b2qF+dElfXRkr4u4m+lT3+1iCfCWH788mwiE 2wDAj/nWaHC/SQhQ9o/auvGIABWosBIi6L1t6J2jwqjikHEFnXuyJEP1NFesuiLCRYhZ 44bQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=L78mtrCrkBRt2ElC0qY2XsJuMGEIzH1I4unUtDJ7ouw=; b=Q7TzMT1xV/kjSrZCssQradQf96Is8cNZYlh3d0ZUgC4ACO4o9rLVv/ydKyZUzCGuWs VZYrf7ibEONE4tZ8Vlx1bM34xgCtKeDjDCT+OEUr+36ZebIm4RcXGn/PRqK+x+3kqHds rqnBys6sRpqiGWs0RpmHyOrtSpcGu1BRByMBvCl0pCDDrSljl33j/maoeRjYo5kdP3Rd zlO2hV7BqexJtzntePoMFuUbkXVDhnrYE71s/SwrO8McTFJBTZA9D8ddljeEQIumOsuL cChnQi7GkxCTs+PuUs27sf2Nwd/ID+Y4bAtyInlAn2rLTCdNc68Kq69JiqLUHz/jL2dP ZfcA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJ3dEl2u3Ps8MqeCNBIT+EJ758SmeqlkoWinzeOsmJ+OoAt9i45I/eUog3O038NDOyoeIRL1n8yiiIlRw== X-Received: by 10.28.182.68 with SMTP id g65mr6161740wmf.12.1465924891325; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:21:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.137.75 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:21:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: outro pessoa Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 13:21:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hello To: Eric Furman , sorressean , adrian@freebsd.org, wblock@wonkity.com, dru@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, misc@openbsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:21:33 -0000 Now, some would call this -and have -off-topic noise; but, there is a reason for this post. Some of you do not think before responding to a post. The words that you choose need to be diplomatic and honest when you doubt another person's intention and/or reason for that person's reply. Your community is open. For some of you, your minds are not. It is time for a change in attitude and approach. On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:53 PM, outro pessoa wrote: > Seeing that you have quoted me from another email that I sent, my decision > is to inquire you on different topics. > Is the cognitive process the same for all members of the human species? > By which method(s) does the human animal learn? > By observation, each culture within an area has its own standards of > normality. The world view of each culture is dependent upon the experience > and understanding of the members of that culture. Education will coincide > with the perception of each member of any given society. Now, that which is > considered sane by the standards of one culture may be considered insane by > the standards of another. > In the scientific method, you must form a hypothesis and prove its > validity. > I will add this to Schrodinger's Paradox. > Being that you are able to observe the quantum event from different > perspectives, you will need to observe the same event from the viewpoint of > the subject if such is possible. Your first hypothesis is that the subject > seems incapable of logic and reasoning to such a degree that the subject's > perception of the events occurring is false and flimsy at best. > I have not experienced that which you have experienced and therefore I > have no right to make any assumption about your nature. > My reactions are erroneous ; yet, the reasons for my reactions are solid. > Your judgement of me is based upon your own experiences and knowledge. > The words "you" and "your" are both plural and general simultaneously. > > I have approached you openly and honestly, admitting to my faults. > Each day, I learn. > Because you are not me, I give you the benefit of the doubt - and, to > admit, this usually occurs after my reaction - when the situation becomes > more personal in nature. > > If you are not able to see the similarities between myself and another - > and this being due to a physical condition - and that your experience with > others has been negative because many do not think about anything but > themselves, it is understood. > > I apologize and attempt to approach differently. > > There are times that a person may have a question to the mailing lists and > that person is not addressed. > > I try to address the question to the best of my knowledge. Now, at times, > I am perceived erroneously by other members of this community. > > If I say, " please do not insult me publicly," that does not mean you have > the right to insult me at all. I did not do this to you. I would not and > have not condemned you if anything has happened to you personally. > My "threat" was a reaction to your disrespect. > > > >