From owner-freebsd-current Tue Oct 7 22:54:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA22250 for current-outgoing; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 22:54:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (root@mexico.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA22245 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 22:54:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: from brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (brasil.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.33]) by mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id HAA26047 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 07:54:56 +0200 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (8.8.6/brasil-1.2) with UUCP id HAA18045 for current@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 07:54:29 +0200 Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.8.7/keltia-2.11/nospam) id HAA00292; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 07:47:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roberto) Message-ID: <19971008074729.20086@keltia.freenix.fr> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 07:47:29 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of perl and tcl in vi? References: <199710071253.FAA06161@freefall.freebsd.org> <19971008001855.ND00353@uriah.heep.sax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84 In-Reply-To: <19971008001855.ND00353@uriah.heep.sax.de>; from J Wunsch on Wed, Oct 08, 1997 at 12:18:55AM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to J Wunsch: > (Perhaps it's only since all the Perl hackers use Emacs anyway. Does > vi do syntax highlighting these days? No? Nothing for me then... :-)) Try vim5 (still in beta at 5.0o), it does. And a pretty good job at that. I really appreciate the procmail highlighting... -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: There are no limits -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #36: Sat Oct 4 19:58:34 CEST 1997