From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Jun 21 19:35:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B6DAC50A9 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 19:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com (mail-it0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B01C81A71; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 19:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-f44.google.com with SMTP id a5so82282683ita.1; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:35:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Wljkupbbt1qrdDXux8vZxn8diLmV8Vjv8lYlgjfb1ds=; b=avQdqbTL5LLvN2E6zK22HU+QmCE/STAMc82crpda9xibDMwe4dTllIqEaLb8ZB0Y9F AJy8//uugPapUO2brKUqN5zzS8gw8hz0CqHs/l+iPFgoPF7smlhYVdXCm2pB7pNt870e HqXaeNIlB8mhiW2lg2N5niAp/CFEDRJbmzSJiejKVi1yfkEfheoZqEG0NVq1fIi9IicD 0rQXRUGfvGT/cQ3f/xQqOTrazkoj5Q1Efxa3uxQgJuy9j/cgE2oeUUuUozg+eWfoT+PT V+u6+Yv18+V6OgzfDoKLmhTO4BuzwHjnDLp16On8bIQNR7L7IWZGNVIGHErOZkqhUPZS rVJg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLnxUbvpyLIURALLVgQjHtr/SKlgEYB8AGaJUEg3pFMdF0UfNR49SuoNA7SKT0agw== X-Received: by 10.36.82.8 with SMTP id d8mr7489876itb.57.1466528122653; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com (mail-io0-f171.google.com. [209.85.223.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x87sm1725568ita.7.2016.06.21.09.55.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io0-f171.google.com with SMTP id s63so17500180ioi.3; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:55:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.107.182.136 with SMTP id g130mr20892095iof.27.1466528121943; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:55:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: cem@freebsd.org Received: by 10.36.205.70 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:55:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <36219e68-a6cd-de7c-f318-b6a65543a087@selasky.org> References: <20160211205358.GA3567@brick.home> <56D811B3.6090406@selasky.org> <20160305155620.GB2512@brick.home> <56DC00EA.7050900@selasky.org> <20160523102055.GA2891@brick> <1556f5196ad.cc101c73136103.7671428586181101222@nextbsd.org> <36219e68-a6cd-de7c-f318-b6a65543a087@selasky.org> From: Conrad Meyer Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:55:21 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Enabling OFED by default. To: Hans Petter Selasky Cc: Matthew Macy , Oded Shanoon , Meny Yossefi , =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= , "freebsd-x11@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 19:35:50 -0000 On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 06/20/16 21:37, Matthew Macy wrote: >> >> Do not enable in tree linuxkpi by default. It will definitely interfere >> with out of tree graphics work, which would harm far far more users than it >> benefits. > > The final goal should be to make the DRM2 LinuxKPI an extension of the > kernel's LinuxKPI so that they can co-exist. This doesn't really make sense. Some of the LinuxKPI changes needed for DRM2 are bugfixes of existing LinuxKPI code. If it was only extensions to the existing APIs, maybe they could be layered. But I don't think anyone considers existing LinuxKPI code completely bug-free. Best, Conrad