From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 30 11:27:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1960616A419 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:27:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9E613C447; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:27:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47778093.5070905@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 12:27:15 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chris H." References: <20071229223028.gkahh4fvggk4ccso@webmail.1command.com> In-Reply-To: <20071229223028.gkahh4fvggk4ccso@webmail.1command.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7B4 scheduling question X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:27:17 -0000 Chris H. wrote: > Greetings, > I realize that the answer to this question is subject to many > possible variables. But I would greatly apreciate a ventured guess > from anyone willing to do so. > Question being: Is ULE considered the best sceduler in 7-CURRENT? > If not, what might be considered the best? > > FWIW this is for a SMP board (2 CPU's) > > Thank you for all your time and considerstion. > Yes, ULE is the recommended scheduler. Kris