From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Jun 16 08:23:21 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA14635
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 16 Jun 1996 08:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA14622
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 16 Jun 1996 08:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA26223; Sun, 16 Jun 1996 09:19:31 -0600
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 1996 09:19:31 -0600
From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199606161519.JAA26223@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users)
Subject: Re: ktrace [Was: 2.2-960612-SNAP resolver problems]
In-Reply-To: <199606160858.KAA00689@uriah.heep.sax.de>
References: <199606160656.QAA19860@felix.antiquity.arts.su.edu.au>
	<199606160858.KAA00689@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > options		KTRACE	# Kernel Tracing; adds ~4k to kernel
> 
> Well, right now i've counted about four ``aye''s, and one ``nope''
> from Nate.  I'm not going to do the deed unless Nate seems to be
> convinced about its usefulness, too, (so the only know objection is
> withdrawn) or unless there's an overwhelming ``Go for it''.

For 4K I say go for it.  I thought it was more, and although I do
understand the hit for syscalls, it can't be any worse than some of the
other additions we make in GENERIC.

So, my objection is withdrawn.


Nate