From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 19 15:45:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (unknown [65.24.0.112]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBFC37B698 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:45:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.iowna.com (dhcp065-024-023-038.columbus.rr.com [65.24.23.38]) by clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f0JNhK704562 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 18:43:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3A68D0FE.F514B52E@mail.iowna.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 18:42:54 -0500 From: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: named soaking up all processor time Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a firewall machine that I recently installed running 4.2-STABLE and acting as a nameserver (among other things) After running for 10 hours or so, named is using 90-100% of the processor time. It's continuing to serve queries just fine and a "kill -HUP" resets it back to using mimimal resources, but this doesn't seem like normal behaviour. It's also using 15M of memory. (kill -HUP does not change the mem usage) For now I'm going to put a cron job that does a "killall -HUP named" every 12 hours, but this is a kludge. Anyone familiar with this or have any guesses. Seems like some kind of processor leak or something. -Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message