Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 11:05:38 -0800 From: "Dan Mahoney (Ports)" <freebsd@gushi.org> To: Daniel Engberg <diizzy@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Freebsd Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Regarding port(s) you maintain in FreeBSD ports collection Message-ID: <F4530345-CC43-4DDA-889A-734DE97C3932@gushi.org> In-Reply-To: <d8029a1dca2771ec0f7b9ca331488ea9@FreeBSD.org> References: <d8029a1dca2771ec0f7b9ca331488ea9@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, This caused me some headscratching (wait, is my port here but not in the = list? Am I mailed because a port here is a dependency of my port?) I=E2=80=99ve concluded that instead I=E2=80=99m receiving this mail = because you sent it to the entire ports mailing list. Am I wrong? > On Nov 7, 2021, at 7:04 AM, Daniel Engberg <diizzy@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > You're receiving this mail because you have one or more ports that are = affected by the change proposed in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32880 . > What it means is that listed ports will be removed after 2022-03-31 = unless you as a maintainer disagree and can provide reasonable argument = why your port(s) shouldn't be removed. > The regular timeout for maintainer feedback (2 weeks) will apply as = listed in Porter's Handbook however if you can reply please do as soon = as possible. >=20 > I would also like to thank you for maintaining ports on the FreeBSD = ports tree. >=20 > Best regards, > Daniel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F4530345-CC43-4DDA-889A-734DE97C3932>