From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 17 16:40:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05F516A4CE; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:40:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDA143D64; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:40:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i6HGe6aI030627 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:40:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost)i6HGe6Dl030626; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:40:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (localhost.klemm.apsfilter.org [127.0.0.1])i6HGZpkp064998; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:35:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from andreas@localhost)i6HGZoJd064997; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:35:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:35:50 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Message-ID: <20040717163550.GA64896@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> References: <200407171308.i6HD8mtD040269@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040717173802.716458aa@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040717173802.716458aa@it.buh.tecnik93.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: itetcu@people.tecnik93.com cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org cc: Andreas Klemm Subject: Re: ports/68358: [NEW PORT] mail/dspam-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:40:09 -0000 On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 05:38:02PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:08:48 GMT > Andreas Klemm wrote: > > > Synopsis: [NEW PORT] mail/dspam-devel > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed > > State-Changed-By: andreas > > State-Changed-When: Sat Jul 17 12:59:13 GMT 2004 > > State-Changed-Why: > > > Can the PR 68358 be closed ? > > When trying to get a repo copy done I noticed, > > that the dspam port has been updated to 3.0.0. > > If you see this port only as a way to get to 3.0.0 then the answer is > yes. > > I don't see it this way; the -devel port has now included SQLite drivers > plus a lot of fixes (notably the change of BDB locking). If there is > more that one person (which one == me) that thinks this port should be > in the tree, I will update it to the last beta + some cvs fixes. > Otherwise I'll do my local patches and try to help the way I can others > on dspam or ports mailing lists. In the meantime I see what you mean. I visited the website. There is a 3.0.0 stable branch and a 3.1.0 developement branch. We need two ports, a 3.0 stable and a 3.1 developement port. I'll try to ask the CVS meisters to do a repository copy. I for myself hacked the dspam port, so that it builds now the newest developement snapshot... This should be resolved by 2 ports ! So that this trickery is not needed. Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/