From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 3 19:51:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E560C1065694 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:51:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@bishopston.net) Received: from pacha.mail.bishopston.net (pacha.mail.bishopston.net [IPv6:2001:5c0:1100:200::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BFE8FC18 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:50:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Catflap-Envelope-From: X-Catflap-Envelope-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from catflap.bishopston.net (jamie@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by catflap.bishopston.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nB3JomsX027756; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:50:48 GMT (envelope-from jamie@catflap.bishopston.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by catflap.bishopston.net (8.14.3/8.12.9/Submit) id nB3JomQq027755; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:50:48 GMT From: Jamie Landeg Jones Message-Id: <200912031950.nB3JomQq027755@catflap.bishopston.net> Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:50:48 +0000 Organization: http://www.bishopston.com/jamie/ To: lxn.smth@gmail.com, freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <200912030930.nB39UhW9038238@freefall.freebsd.org> <864f75cb0912031149p64695dd0kd1770348114d6c0c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <864f75cb0912031149p64695dd0kd1770348114d6c0c@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (catflap.bishopston.net [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:50:48 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at catflap.bishopston.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-09:16.rtld X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:51:22 -0000 > Any body can explain why no credit section for this advisory? Probably because the person who found the bug didn't notify the security team, but posted it on a public list to gain l33t points.