From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 10: 2:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1AA14E9B for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 10:01:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA098326039; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 12:27:19 -0500 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 12:27:19 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: "Jan B. Koum " Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? In-Reply-To: <19990313042700.C24467@best.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Jan B. Koum wrote: > Doing the nasty thing and switching subject: > Is it just me, or is it now that we have 3.x and 4.x most of > the bug fixes in 4.x never make it back into 3.x? It's not just you, few things are being merged, and it's going to get ugly once these files start to change. I can understand the vm stuff taking a while, but a lot of changes (man pages, nits, etc) shouldn't even have conflicts on a merge. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message