Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 1 Apr 2020 13:10:13 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-reproducibility@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Nonreproducible kernel modules on stable/12
Message-ID:  <CANCZdfpX4pO0ZLx2O7qHocaMBzoB1fKV8tjMPdZHRgY-A4MfoA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2Bzuk3tyrPdkw4L2xD%2BWE6qG1mRDG0hGEx0QOxw%2BXVDvA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAPyFy2Bzuk3tyrPdkw4L2xD%2BWE6qG1mRDG0hGEx0QOxw%2BXVDvA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Sigh

freebsd-update-build is being naughty:

sed -i "" -E "s,^(BRANCH=.*)\",\1$2\","

and editing newvers.sh directly.

This doesn't work.

However, the change was

BRANCH="STABLE"
to
BRANCH=${BRANCH_OVERRIDE:-STABLE}

maybe a quick hack is to add back the quotes or to change the above sed to

sed -i "" -E "s,^(BRANCH=.*),\1\"$2\","

which would work on all branches because the expression

BRANCH="STABLE""-p2"

is well formed as is

BRANCH=${BRANCH_OVERRIDE:-STABLE}"-p2"

Warner

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:08 AM Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Originally reported off-list, during a stable/12 freebsd-update build
> kernel modules are not reproducible and thus get included in the
> update.
>
> diffoscope reports that the .SUNW_ctf section is responsible:
>
> --- cam.0.ko
> +++ cam.1.ko
> ├── readelf --wide --sections {}
> ...
> │    [30] .shstrtab         STRTAB          0000000000000000 0ea828
> 0001f8 00      0   0  1
> │ -  [31] .SUNW_ctf         PROGBITS        0000000000000000 0f29d8
> 00e2ad 00     32   0  4
> │ +  [31] .SUNW_ctf         PROGBITS        0000000000000000 0f29d8
> 00e2b1 00     32   0  4
> │    [32] .symtab           SYMTAB          0000000000000000 0e12b8
> 009570 18     33 1001  8
> ...
> ├── readelf --wide --decompress --hex-dump=.SUNW_ctf {}
> │ @@ -1,3630 +1,3631 @@
> │
> │  Hex dump of section '.SUNW_ctf':
> │    0x00000000 f1cf0201 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................
> │    0x00000010 08000000 96040000 fc250000 f4310100 .........%...1..
> │ -  0x00000020 6aeb0000 78dabc7d 077c54c5 16f7ccbd j...x..}.|T.....
> │ -  0x00000030 774b42ca 26b48524 b0402001 02440d10 wKB.&..$.@ ..D..
> ...
> │ +  0x00000020 6feb0000 78dabc7d 077c54c5 16f7ccdc o...x..}.|T.....
> │ +  0x00000030 bb252165 13da4242 586a0204 081820d4 .%!e..BBXj.... .
>
> (And build-ID and GNU debuglink differ as a result.)
>
> Running ctfdump and comparing the result shows the issue:
>
> --- a   2020-03-31 10:04:39.766567000 -0400
> +++ b   2020-03-31 10:04:44.663292000 -0400
> @@ -11,11 +11,11 @@
>    cth_funcoff  = 1174
>    cth_typeoff  = 9724
>    cth_stroff   = 78324
> -  cth_strlen   = 60266
> +  cth_strlen   = 60271
>
>  - Label Table
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -   2407 FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE amd64 1201512
> +   2407 FreeBSD 12.1-FUTUREBUILD amd64 1201512
>
>  - Data Objects
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Aside, we should add ctfdump to diffoscope.
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfpX4pO0ZLx2O7qHocaMBzoB1fKV8tjMPdZHRgY-A4MfoA>