Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:50:53 +0100 From: Jorn Argelo <jorn@wcborstel.com> To: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's the point of the shell choice in single user mode? Message-ID: <4754500D.8070706@wcborstel.com> In-Reply-To: <20071203181412.709fab80@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <20071201044427.38bd2c84@asus.freeode.co.uk> <20071201061813.2a0e35e2@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20071201140619.4b7332ba@asus.freeode.co.uk> <4752EFF1.9050107@wcborstel.com> <20071203181412.709fab80@gumby.homeunix.com.>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
RW wrote: > On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:48:33 +0100 > Jorn Argelo <jorn@wcborstel.com> wrote: > > > >> Also note that vi doesn't work by default as it needs to write >> to /tmp. So mount /tmp or re-mount / to RW permissions. >> > > I think vi will also fail unless it has access to termcap, so you'd > need /usr mounted too. > You'd need to mount /usr anyway, as the vi binary is located in /usr/bin ;-) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4754500D.8070706>