From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Apr 18 14:47:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mailsrv.otenet.gr (mailsrv.otenet.gr [195.170.0.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE21437B405 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 14:47:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hades.hell.gr (patr530-b192.otenet.gr [212.205.244.200]) by mailsrv.otenet.gr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3ILlQrc019772 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:47:27 +0300 (EEST) Received: from hades.hell.gr (hades [127.0.0.1]) by hades.hell.gr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3ILlO6M005274 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:47:24 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from charon@localhost) by hades.hell.gr (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g3ILifCv005207; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:44:41 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:44:41 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Steven Huwig Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tact Message-ID: <20020418214441.GD3398@hades.hell.gr> References: <001901c1e702$17333fb0$3200a8c0@internal.lan> <20020418175925.GA5384@submonkey.net> <20020418111530.B25502@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <3CBF1EA2.3010101@po.cwru.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CBF1EA2.3010101@po.cwru.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On 2002-04-18 15:29, Steven Huwig wrote: >Brooks Davis wrote: >>On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 06:59:25PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: >>>It's not referring to the same incident. >>>That part of the document predates September 11th, 2001. >>> >>>We've discussed this here before, and the general consensus (which I >>>personally agree with) was that it remains a good example, even after >>>the event you're concerned with (perhaps even more so). >> >>I would suggest that this be footnoted. > > Even better, perhaps the example can be made more explicit: "A number of > firms learned this the hard way after the 1993 explosion at the World > Trade Center." I like this! Being explicit won't hurt a bit. I don't really care about being ``politically correct'', but since this very same question is going to be thought, asked, replied and hashed to death periodically, it is a very good idea to be as specific as possible. Giorgos. --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE8vz5I1g+UGjGGA7YRAjUzAKCJhLjxoWz4KlHIinLtLClsgYhIUACfU5vC 4c7CJMaaoshTvVLvvmrYoxU= =Kc33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message