Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Nov 1999 06:58:26 +1100
From:      Peter Jeremy <jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>
To:        "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: /usr/local
Message-ID:  <99Nov15.065214est.40327@border.alcanet.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <19991112090136.A87828@dragon.nuxi.com>
References:  <xzpyac4f3f4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <19991112090136.A87828@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1999-Nov-13 04:01:36 +1100, David O'Brien wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 10:46:23AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>> How would people feel about adding /usr/local/include and
>> /usr/local/lib to gcc's default header and library search paths,
...
>Adding -IPREFIX/include to gcc burns this into the binary, and that is
>not easy for a sysadmin to change.

Note that gcc supports a `specs' file which can do this sort of thing
(the non-existent /usr/libdata/gcc/specs).  It should be fairly easy
to change things to install this file.  (Admittedly, it's not the
easiest thing to hand-edit).

Peter




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?99Nov15.065214est.40327>