From owner-freebsd-security  Sat Jun 22 13:32:43 1996
Return-Path: owner-security
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA07419
          for security-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 13:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from post.io.org (post.io.org [198.133.36.6])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA07409
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 13:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zap.io.org (taob@zap.io.org [198.133.36.81]) by post.io.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA27055; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 16:29:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 16:30:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Brian Tao <taob@io.org>
To: nash@mcs.com
cc: FREEBSD-SECURITY-L <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: IPFW vs. IP Filter?
In-Reply-To: <199606221941.OAA15871@zen.nash.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.92.960622162900.20889A-100000@zap.io.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 22 Jun 1996, Alex Nash wrote:
>
> That's not a current -current :)
>
> # ls -l /usr/src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.8
> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  7396 Jun 15 18:01 /usr/src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.8

    Ah, that's the one I have in my mirror... on closer inspection, it
*is* newer than the ones on my 2.2-SNAP servers.  :)  I just nroff'd
it and looked at the date in the page footers (which still say
"February 24, 1996").  My mistake
--
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org, taob@ican.net)
Systems and Network Administrator, Internet Canada Corp.
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"