From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 11:08:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FE037B401 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 11:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E41A43FBD for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 11:08:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h48I8exa001343; Thu, 8 May 2003 20:08:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: alih@internetDog.org From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 08 May 2003 14:02:10 EDT." <20030508140210.B26126@internetDog.org> Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 20:08:40 +0200 Message-ID: <1342.1052417320@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cache_purge > cache_zap segmentation fault X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 18:08:52 -0000 In message <20030508140210.B26126@internetDog.org>, Ali Bahar writes: > >Hi David, >you're right. The name cache is system-wide. > >I still need to understand the difference between a vnode's >v_cache_src and v_cache_dst (IOW, a namecache's nc_src and nc_dst), One is for the chain which a (directory) vnode sources, the other is the chain where the (any type) vnode hangs from it's parent directory. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.