From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 8 12:18:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC4E37B4C5; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 12:18:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eA8KI8g15951; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 13:18:09 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id NAA32387; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 13:18:07 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200011082018.NAA32387@harmony.village.org> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" Subject: Re: vx driver patch Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , Bill Paul , current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 Nov 2000 15:08:27 EST." References: Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 13:18:07 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: : On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Warner Losh wrote: : > The cardbus code, for example, will or in the RF_SHAREABLE bit when : > appropriate. : : Right, but the drivers that are consumers of the PCI or CARDBUS bus : interface shouldn't have to deal with RF_SHAREABLE; the bus driver should : do that. I grant you that this isn't the case at the moment but it should : be. We are in violent agreement. The cardbus bridge code is the one that adds RF_SHAREABLE in the right places. This should allow us, in the fullness of time, to share interrupts for the 16-bit cards in cardbus sockets, for example, w/o sharing them for those cards in a i82365SL socket. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message